Twitter recently launched version 1.0 of the Innovator’s
Patent Agreement or “IPA.” The IPA is
meant to establish a standard, but evolving, document that companies can sign
on to in order to clearly establish how company developed patents will be
maintained and used.
A couple of key points covered by the IPA include the
following:
·
The company agrees not to bring any claims of
one or more patents except for “Defensive Purposes”; and
·
The IPA grants inventors, often employees of the
company, a license enabling them to grant non-exclusive sublicenses.
Twitter has agreed to adopt the IPA overall with respect to
its patenting practices, but companies can also elect to adopt the agreement on
a case by case basis depending upon its circumstances and business models. Generally speaking, the purpose of the
document is to help foster more open and innovative development, especially in
the software community and to help shape the discussion related to the current
state of the patenting process and act as a means to slow down and counter the
effects of “patent trolls” or non-practicing entities.
Some have expressed reservations about the various carve
outs and ambiguities present in the document including the agreement’s
definition of “Defensive Purposes,” which includes the right to bring claims
against entities that (i) file, maintain, threaten or voluntarily participate
in a patent suit against the company, (ii) file, maintain, threaten or
voluntarily participate in a patent suit against anyone in the past ten years,
unless brought defensively, and those suits
(iii) brought to deter a patent litigation threat against the company,
users, affiliates, customers, suppliers or distributors. One can imagine the broad interpretation that
can be used in conjunction with deterring a patent litigation.
In any event, Twitter’s initiative makes a substantive
contribution to the ongoing discussion regarding the proper role of
intellectual property and the way its protection and use should be maintained
and, when necessary, enforced.
The actual IPA can be found here. In addition, a comprehensive piece on the IPA
can be read at Jolt Digest of the Harvard Journal of Law and Technology.
No comments:
Post a Comment