A New Jersey
appellate court has upheld the state parole board’s restriction disallowing
convicted sex offenders from accessing social media or other comparable web
sites.
Superior Court Judge,
Jack Sabatino, writing for the three judge panel, said, “we are
satisfied that the Internet restrictions adopted here by the Parole Board have
been constitutionally tailored to attempt to strike a fair balance.” Judge Sabatino continued, “We recognize that
websites such as Facebook and LinkedIn have developed a variety of uses apart
from interactive communications with third parties. Even so, the Parole Board has reasonably
attempted to draw the line of permitted access in a fair manner that balances
the important public safety interests at stake with the offenders’ interests in
free expression and association.”
The defendants, several convicted sexual offenders whose
cases were consolidated, challenged the constitutionality of the restrictions
as infringing their First Amendment rights of free speech and association, a
violation of their Due Process rights and
corresponding rights under New Jersey’s Constitution. The restrictions stem from Megan’s Law, which
is a series of laws, originally passed in New Jersey , aimed at sex offenders. One component of Megan’s law includes a
requirement that those persons convicted between 1994 and 2004 of certain
sexual offenses must serve, in addition to any existing sentence, a special
sentence of “community supervision for
life,” and those convicted after that date range are sentenced to “parole
supervision for life.”
The New Jersey Parole Board’s restriction does provide for
parolees to seek special permission for gaining access to certain sites for
work or another “reasonable purpose.”
The state’s Deputy Attorney General said, “It is not the Parole Board’s
intention that these provisions bar appellants from having Internet access to
news, entertainment, and commercial transactions.”
The New Jersey
restriction is hardly novel as these cases have been sprouting up throughout
the nation with varied outcomes. You can
read the full opinion here.
Good post! Thanks for sharing this information I appreciate it. God bless!
ReplyDeletewaltham attorney